LWV Logo

LWV Portland Positions

The League adopts position statements only after in-depth study and member agreement. Once the League adopts a position, it can be used to shape public policy.

The LWV Portland positions, as of April 2007, are listed below. You may also be interested in seeing the LWV Oregon positions and the LWV United States positions.


City of Portland

City Government (1991, 1965, 1963, 1961)

The League of Women Voters of Portland, Oregon finds that the present commission form of city government is accountable, flexible and responsive to citizens.

Therefore, we support the commission form of city government as it exists in Portland. We do not support a council-manager or a weak mayor-council form of government.

Under the commission form we support both increased long-range planning and regional cooperation.

We support the continuation of city-wide elections for the offices of commissioners and mayor and no limit on the number of terms these elected officials may serve. We support the mayor’s prerogative of appointing council members to be in a charge of city bureaus for any length of time.

City Hiring Practices (1991)

The League of Women Voters of Portland, Oregon supports a personnel policy for the City of Portland which includes the merit system and independent oversight.

The personnel policy for the City should include:

Planning (1974, 1973)

The League of Women Voters of Portland views the primary goals of city planning to be area wide orderly growth and development that is healthy and visually attractive. Coordination, citizen involvement and long-range planning are necessary tools for promoting these goals. The foremost guide for planning should be human needs. Other guidelines should include livability, economic growth, conservation and development of physical resources.

Economic Development Assistance (1981)

The League of Women Voters of Portland believes the City of Portland should play a leadership role in supporting the stability, growth and diversification of the economy within the city limits.

Programs for assistance in economic development and promotion of local employment opportunities to public and private entities may include:

In supporting local development, the City of Portland should assist industrial commercial districts in outlying areas as well as the downtown core and should favor development which significantly increases private sector jobs.

Neighborhood Associations (1975, 1973, 2007)

1. The LWV of Portland believes that Portland’s Neighborhood Associations have the potential to serve the public good by providing important opportunities for civic participation and improving neighborhood livability. To meet this potential, Neighborhood Associations must be integrated into city networks of communication and decision-making, and they must be adequately supported by city funding and services. Neighborhood Associations, in turn, need to consistently invite and include all residents in their operations.

2. Portland’s neighborhood system structure:

3. The city’s role in supporting Neighborhood Associations should consist of:

At the Council and Bureau level:

Through the Office of Neighborhood Involvement: 4. Successful Neighborhood Associations should: 5. Neighborhood Associations should not be the only avenue for civic engagement with Portland’s government. If resources are adequate, city assistance could be offered to groups other than Neighborhood Associations to increase organizational capacity. When Neighborhood Associations are functioning effectively, with both the resources to do their work, and city’s acknowledgement of their role, encouragement should be given to other community groups to channel work on civic issues through the neighborhood system.

Portland Police Bureau (1982)

The League of Women Voters of Portland believes the primary function of the Portland Police Bureau is the protection of life and property through the just and effective enforcement of the law, including crime prevention programs and strong visibility of the police.

Just and effective enforcement of the law demands good police/community relations. We support the specialized education and training of police personnel in human relations, including the use of specialists from outside the Bureau. The selection and assignment of police personnel should reflect the individual’s knowledge of and sensitivity to variations in community needs.

We support citizen involvement in the functioning of the Portland Police Bureau including, but not limited to, budget advisory committees, precinct advisory councils, and citizen advisory groups.

Portland Development Commission (1982)

The League of Women Voters of Portland believes the Portland Development Commission (PDC) should encourage citizen participation in all aspects of PDC activities. The League supports the following guidelines to that end:

Non-Profit Corporations Associated with the City of Portland (1993)

The League of Women Voters of Portland supports the City of Portland’s ability to establish public non-profit corporations for the administration of specific public purposes. The League is aware of the advantages inherent in the public non-profit corporation format for facilitating funding, attracting professional participation, securing public support and/or maintaining political neutrality.

However, the City would be responsible for establishing guidelines governing creation, structure and operation of each public non-profit corporation it creates. These guidelines should include requirements for public meetings, public access to records, declarations of conflict of interest, open competitive bidding and representative governing boards. The governing board should represent diverse interests and should include public members as well as professionals within a specific field.

Because public non-profit corporations created by the City of Portland remain the responsibility of the City Council, these corporations should be subject to financial audit and regular review for possible termination.

Public non-profit corporations which are partially funded by the City should also meet requirements for public meetings, provide public access to records and adhere to some form of open competitive bidding.


Multnomah County

County Government (2004, 1983, 1978, 1976, 1964, 1958)

In the interest of providing economical and efficient county government that is responsive to the people, the Leagues of Women Voters of Portland and East Multnomah County support home rule for Multnomah County.

The Leagues of Women Voters of Portland and East Multnomah County also support:

Multnomah County Library System (2004, 1986)

The League of Women Voters of East Multnomah County and the League of Women Voters of Portland support a public library system that upholds the principles of intellectual freedom and the public’s right to know. We support the library as a basic community service with an assured, stable and adequate source of funding that will allow:


Education

Public School Districts in Portland (2006 revised, 1980, 1979, 1976, 1975, 1973, 1972, 1971, 1969, 1968)

The League of Women Voters believes the public schools should provide quality education for all children and develop the greatest potential in each individual.

School District #1 (2000)

While the League of Women Voters of Portland recognizes that the major responsibility for funding public schools has shifted to the State level, the League supports local measures when necessary to ensure quality education.

Multnomah Education Service District (MESD) (1986)

The League of Women Voters of Portland and East Multnomah County believe Education Service Districts (ESDs) as currently structured are the most effective way to deliver regional educational services. The option of merging ESDs into fewer units should remain open for future consideration.

The League supports efforts to increase public awareness of MESD services. Such efforts could include the identification of MESD services used by school districts for parents and teachers as well as increased public information activities by MESD.

The League supports election of board members on primary election day. The League also supports wide distribution of sufficient information about the candidates to assure visibility to the voters.


Social Policy

Housing (1989)

City, County and private sectors should continually monitor changes in the population needing affordable housing and address their housing needs.

Criteria to be used when selecting areas for neighborhood revitalization should include neighborhoods: a) at risk of further deterioration; b) showing some evidence of stability, citizen involvement and community support; c) having a community focal point, such as a school, park, community center and/or convenient transportation.

We support a variety of means to encourage private investments in low-income housing, such as tax abatement, tax credits, low-interest loans and grants.

We favor consolidation of City, County and private agencies involved in housing within the City of Portland. Benefits derived from the consolidation include: less duplication, cost efficiency, convenience to the public, shared knowledge and heightened awareness of the importance of adequate housing.

Housing (1981)

The League of Women Voters of Portland supports:

As a general policy, the League of Women Voters of Portland does not favor city acquisition of buildings for low-income housing or SRO units. Only if all other means for retaining low-income housing or buildings of historical importance have failed, should the city purchase such property. The League recommends that some entity other than the city administer buildings acquired in this manner.

The League favors financing of any such building acquisitions by tax increment funds, housing and community development block grants or revenue bonds.

Community Residential Facilities (2007, 1977)

The League of Women Voters of Portland supports the use of Residential Care Facilities for socially dependent individuals as defined by state law, Residential Training Facilities for individuals with physical and developmental disabilities and Residential Treatment Facilities for individuals with alcohol and/or drug dependence and those with mental and/or emotional disorders.

The League supports Community Residential Facilities for individuals with a criminal history provided clients are carefully screened and monitored and consideration is given to the impact on the community.

Community Residential Facilities are licensed by the State. Standards should provide for quality staffing, facilities and care.

Teenage Girls at Risk (1995)

The League of Women Voters of Portland, Oregon supports equal access to appropriate services for at risk girls and boys. These services should be comprehensive in nature and should include outreach, treatment and follow-up.

We support:

Juvenile Justice (2006, 2003, 1997)

1. The general goals and characteristics of the juvenile justice system should be to:

2. We believe that mandatory minimum sentencing for a broad range of juvenile crimes is not a desirable goal of the juvenile justice system. The justice system should have some flexibility to consider a youth’s family circumstances and personal history. There should be guidelines for sentencing to encourage equal sentences for equal offenses, but these should not be mandatory.

3. We support the adoption of a “second look” concept for 15- to 17-year-olds convicted of Measure 11 offenses. The purpose of this “second look” should be to encourage rehabilitation. The decision to reduce a sentence should be made in a court hearing before a judge and based on testimony from a panel of professionals acquainted with the case.

4. Although the over-representation of minorities in the Multnomah County Juvenile Justice system is due in large part to societal problems, we agree with justice officials that the justice system should work to correct this imbalance in the following ways suggested by Krisberg and Austin in their publication Reinventing Juvenile Justice:

5. Services of the justice system, such as parent effectiveness classes, should be extended to family members of youth involved with the justice system. Punishment of parents for the acts of their children should occur only after all other efforts have proved ineffective. An array of possible penalties in addition to financial fines should be available to provide a flexible response to gaining parental cooperation.

6. Youth under the age of 18 should not be subject to automatic waiver to adult court. Youth under 15 should be assumed incapable of understanding the legal system adequately to stand trial in adult court. All other juveniles should be evaluated for their competency to stand trial before being turned over to the adult court system.